By Akhigbe Samson
The dynamic nature of diplomatic
relations in the international system is an established fact, Nigeria
however continues to tilt towards a static methodology in the practice
of its foreign relations. The behaviour of nations in the 21st century
is being determined by many factors; ironically, very few of these
factors are a spill-over from the 20th century. While the 20th century
international system was largely determined by rigid political
structures like the Alliance System, the World Wars, the Cold War, rise
of new nations (especially in Africa) among others, the 21st century is
being defined by socio-economic factors rather than political factors.
Unprecedented political behaviours are
shifting grounds to dire socio-economic necessities thereby forcing
nations with little or no political similarities to ally economically
and socially. The international system in recent times is being defined
by terrorism, climate change, corporate governance, Islamic
fundamentalism, rise in poverty levels, global economic recession, the
growth of new economies and gay rights. In the 20th century,
very few analysts would have theorized that trivial issues such as gay
rights would define the diplomatic relationship among States. The recent
anti-gay law in Nigeria and the reaction of the West is an example of
how non-political events are affecting diplomatic relations. These new
trends are affecting the behaviour of nations as regards alliances; the
rigid political alliances are shifting grounds for more pressing issues.
Against this background, this article
takes a critical look at Nigeria’s alliances in the 21st century, and
proposes strongly that Nigeria’s survival in the international system is
premised on a systematic downgrade of its relationship with the USA.
Historically, Nigeria’s foreign policy
revolves around what Professor Ibrahim Gambari describes as ‘Concentric
Circle Theory of Nigeria’s Foreign Policy’. The Circle has four layers;
the first layer defines relationship with her closest neighbours like
Chad, Benin, Niger and Cameroon. The next layer focuses on ECOWAS; the
third layer focuses on Africa while the last layer emphasizes our role
in the International System. This Circle popularizes the concept ‘Africa
as the Center-Piece of Nigeria’s Foreign Policy’, a concept whereby
Africa and Africans is the primary focus of Nigeria’s diplomatic
practices.
It is the position of this article that
our diplomatic relationship with the West nay USA was premised on
colonialism. Following the termination of colonialism, Nigeria has tried
to define new relationships in the international sphere, but she keeps
falling on her knees to please the colonisers. The military governments
of Murtala Mohammed and Sani Abacha were perhaps the only
administrations that made strong attempts to severe ties with the West.
In recent years, Nigerian leaders have
failed to recognize and apply the fact that morality is enmity to
survival within our contemporary international system. According to Hans
Morgenthau in his work “Politics Among Nations”, he argued that
universal moral principles cannot be applied to the actions of States
and political realism refuses to identify the moral aspirations of a
particular nation with the moral laws that govern the universe. In
simple terms, nations first and foremost consider their interest without
recourse to the welfare of other nations. It is pedestrian to assume
that a nation will assist you because you are ‘friends’. Our idealism
has in time past cost us so much resource that could have been used to
strengthen the nation.
The only reason USA maintains
relationship with any nation is because of what it can benefit from that
nation, the moment there is nothing to benefit, the USA severs or
downgrades the relationship. Nigeria in 2015 is of no economic benefit
to the USA, thus their body language towards Nigeria is beginning to
surface in its hostility towards Nigeria. There are no special entry
privileges for Nigerians, it is even more difficult for a Nigerian to
process a USA visa than most nations of the world. For decades, the USA
through its multinational oil companies in collaboration with corrupt
Nigerian leaders have benefitted so much from Nigeria’s oil reserves,
now that the oil is near worthless, the USA has moved on without
recourse to the effect on Nigeria’s economy.
Gullible and corrupt Nigerian leaders
are hooked on the idea that we have a friend in USA. Despite Nigeria’s
rich and commendable contributions to military operations in and outside
Africa, she is not getting the desired help in its fight against
insurgency in the North Eastern Region. Nigerian leaders should as a
matter of urgency downgrade its relationship with the USA. The USA in
recent years have continued to show its disdain for the development of
the nation.
Aside predicting the break-up of the
nation, the US President has failed to pay any courtesy visit to Nigeria
since 2008 citing security issues. Our leaders who are desperate to
enjoy the comfort of the USA continue to visit rather than stay home and
develop the nation. It is time we begin to relate as peers, not as
colonies. Our political independence should count for something after
five decades. We are bedeviled by institutionalized corruption and
fragile socio-political institutions, we are constantly threatened by
internal dynamics occasioned by the poverty of leadership. We are
therefore overtly focused on satiating the oversized egos of USA.
As a nation, for us to stand tall within
the comity of nations, Nigeria must focus on intensive internal
development. Our resources must be utilized optimally to improve the
conditions of living; our society must be built around institutions and
not personalities. There has to be a hunger for lasting growth. The
truth is; we must as a matter of expediency, shield ourselves from
outside influence. The Chinese example is worth emulating as the results
show. Several nations have downgraded their relationship with the USA,
the heavens did not fall, it is time we severe the rotten umbilical
cord.
No comments:
Post a Comment