by Olalekan Adetayo
Ahead of next month’s presidential
election, many individuals and groups have been routing for President
Goodluck Jonathan’s re-election. In the case of groups, they come in
various creative names coined around either the President’s first name,
Goodluck, or the present administration’s agenda for national
transformation. Brains behind the groups cut across all strata of the
nation: politicians, Nollywood stars, sports ambassadors and businessmen
among others.
At individual levels are politicians
mainly from the ruling Peoples Democratic Party and its subsidiaries as
well as top government officials and presidential aides.
They all have one message for Nigerians:
give Jonathan a Valentine’s gift on February 14 by re-electing him.
Though the message is the same, methods of disseminating the message
differ from one individual or group to another.
The truth however is that like the
saying that too many cooks spoil the broth, many of the President’s
campaigners are doing more harm than good to his re-election bid in the
way they go about it. A mention of a few of the President’s cooks that
may be causing havoc for his campaign (may be unknowingly) will suffice
here.
Leading the pack is Governor Ayodele
Fayose of Ekiti State. He is no doubt committed to Jonathan’s second
term ambition and has stated this many times. What is of concern however
is the way he goes about it.
During the PDP presidential rally held
in his state on January 13, Fayose dwelt too much on the need to
disqualify Jonathan’s major contender, Muhammadu Buhari of the All
Progressives Congress because he did not present his certificate to the
Independent National Electoral Commission as required by law.
The governor did not stop there. One
after the other, Fayose brandished photocopies of his primary school
leaving certificate, secondary school leaving certificate, national
diploma and higher national diploma to the admiration of party faithful.
He thereafter challenged Buhari to do the same. The question that came
to the mind of many was whether Fayose is the one contesting against the
former military leader.
During the week, the governor gave many
people a topic to discuss for a long time when he published what is now
being referred to as “death-wish advert” in newspapers. In the advert,
Fayose insinuated that Nigerians may risk another state burial if they
cast their votes for septuagenarian Buhari. Although the PDP and the
President’s campaign organisation had disowned the advert and its
sponsor, the governor insisted he owes no one any apology as he was only
exercising his freedom of expression.
Despite the outcry that followed that
advert, he placed another one on Thursday. He wrote that if former
President Olusegun Obasanjo could be called “Baba” at 62 in 1999, then
Buhari will be called “Baba baba” (grandpa) at 72 in 2015. He signed off
by writing that Buhari is too old to govern Nigeria, insinuating that
his candidature is an agenda of a few cabals against the country.
Fayose may mean well for Jonathan, but
whichever way we look at it, this unnecessary jibe will do the
President’s ambition no good.
The issue of Jonathan’s too many cooks
cannot be treated without a generous mention of the elderly Ijaw leader,
Chief Edwin Clark. The man appears to love Jonathan and his Presidency
so much that he picks a quarrel with anybody or group he perceives to be
anti-Jonathan.
In doing this, to me, he ends up creating more enemies for the President.
Lately, he had condemned Obasanjo for
allegedly being against Jonathan. He had accused the INEC boss, Prof.
Attahiru Jega, of being partial against Jonathan. He had criticised PDP
National Chairman, Adamu Muazu, for creating problems for Jonathan by
imposing former chairman of the Economic and Financial Crimes
Commission, Nuhu Ribadu, as the party’s governorship candidate in
Adamawa State. He had faulted the Attorney-General of the Federation,
Muhammed Adoke (SAN), for not advising Jonathan to perpetrate illegality
by sacking governors of Adamawa, Borno and Yobe when he declared
emergency rule in those states.
The octogenarian seems to believe that
he is the only one in the country that means well for the President. By
so doing, he creates more enemies for Jonathan, the same way Fayose is
doing.
Many government officials and
presidential aides also cause havoc daily for the President by their
utterances and actions. Evidence abound on social media and pages of
newspapers. Theirs will be topic for another day.
The fact is that the opinions or actions
of these people are oftentimes seen by many as being the President’s
position, especially when he fails to rebuke them publicly. If indeed
Jonathan wishes to sing the halleluyah chorus at the end of the
presidential election, he must caution some, if not all his cooks, so
that they don’t continue spoiling the broth for him.
Jonathan goes to Maiduguri
Barring any last minute change in plan,
by the time you will be reading this, Jonathan will be labouring hard to
convince a fraction of the people of Borno State on the need for those
of them who will be courageous enough to line up at polling booths on
February 14 to vote for him. Why a fraction of the people of the state? I
guess that it will not be a priority for thousands of people who are
currently taking refuge in various centres created for Internally
Displaced Persons to be attending campaign rallies.
Today’s visit to Maiduguri will be
Jonathan’s second within a few days. He had penultimate Thursday visited
the city to give the needed boost to security agents operating in the
troubled state and offer succour to victims of insurgents.
It was indeed a surprise visit. Jonathan
had earlier in the day taken a break from his nationwide campaigns to
lay wreath at the National Arcade as part of activities marking the 2015
Armed Forces Remembrance Day celebration. The expectation of State
House correspondents was that he would return to the Villa to attend to
other national issues after the event. But that was not to be.
News filtered in that the President was
on his way to Maiduguri. The trip was a top secret. The usual security
presence along the road from the Villa to the Presidential Wing of the
Nnamdi Azikwe International Airport which always characterise
presidential movement was not present.
Jonathan’s handlers must have learnt
from his aborted trip to Chibok where over 200 schoolgirls were abducted
in 2014. Arrangements had been concluded to embark on the trip to the
community in May last year. Members of the President’s advance team were
already in the state capital, putting finishing touches to preparation
to receive him.
Suddenly, the music changed. The
President stayed back. Following the criticisms that followed,
presidential aides claimed Jonathan was never billed to visit the
troubled community. This must have informed the decision to make his
visit to Maiduguri strictly confidential.
Expectedly however, that visit drew
mixed reactions from Nigerians with many seeing it as political. Those
who belong to that school of thought said the President only embarked on
that trip to soften the ground for his campaign in the state capital
billed for today.
Some others however agreed that, though
late in coming, the trip was needed and should be commended. They were
also quick to add that Jonathan should not limit such visit to
Maiduguri. He should extend his courage and visit Chibok, Baga, Biu and
other towns that had been ravaged by insurgents.
Whichever way, the President must have used the trip to prove a point: that he is free to visit every part of the country.
- Credit: Olalekan Adetayo/Punch
No comments:
Post a Comment