By Niran Adedokun
In the course of the past five years,
Dame Patience Jonathan has transformed from the unheard, supporting wife
of a former vice-president, into possibly the most talked about wife of
any Nigerian leader in history. You may like her, or dislike her, but
it has become impossible to ignore this Okrika, Rivers State born
“mother of the nation.”
In some sense, I admire Mama Peace. To
begin with, I find her to be a woman who is at home in her own skin.
There are no pretences about Mama Peace as her admirers call her. But
for the heavy, expensive organza laces and jewellery that may
have come into her wardrobe, I am tempted to assume that not much has
changed about this woman since her husband became President five years
ago.
When you accuse her of deficiency in the
accurate usage of the English language, she joins Afro Juju maestro,
Sir Shina Peters, in reminding you that “grammar no be money, grammar no
be success… grammar no be my language.” She speaks what comes to her
mind, when it comes and how it comes, not minding the headache that
grammarians could suffer from her generous verbiage. The First Lady
talks her walk and walks her talk, without regard to whose ox is gored.
Devoid of the hypocrisy of
Intellectualism which makes a lot of us pretend, Mrs Jonathan soldiers
on, unperturbed, not discouraged, not allowing the ball to drop in spite
of how much we have ridiculed and mocked her. She seems to have
concluded in her mind that the joke is on the majority of us, as she
goes on proving to us to be a better mobiliser of men than the husband
on whose ticket she has the privilege of our attention.
A corollary to this down-to-earth nature
is the power that the Dame wields. Now, I do not mean power over her
husband, although that would not be far-fetched, after all every woman
has a measure of leverage over her spouse. But I will return to that
issue in a bit.
So this lady is powerful. While lovers
of sophisticated speech grumble and complain about how she brings
ridicule to them and the country that they love, the Dame is busy at
ministering to those who hear her, to a constituency too glad to see a
president’s wife who is able to come down to their level, sing their
songs and dance to their type of music. As a result, this First Lady has
formed a band of loyalists who understands her language and would do
anything to ensure that the woman who communicates with them retains
office for another four years by electing her husband when the time
comes.
Of course, it is easy to dismiss this
theory as the ranting of a naïve writer, but truth be told, within the
seemingly endless banality of the offerings of the President’s wife,
hides a formidable communication tool, which resonates with the ordinary
woman, the woman who represents those who go to the voting field while
we are pontificating in our living rooms on the utopian state that we
desire.
But with the benefit of hindsight,
Nigerians’ disgust and impatience with First Ladies did not start today.
Since the late Mrs. Maryam Babangida gave life to the position in the
late 1980s, there has been one reason or the other to get at every
incumbent President’s wife.
For example, people felt that Maryam
Babangida controlled her husband, in addition to being too flamboyant.
Mrs Mariam Abacha was disparaged for being the power being the throne.
Justice Fati Abubakar escaped public scrutiny because she kept herself
busy in the courts without much time to court at the Aso Rock Villa.
The late Mrs Stella Obasanjo was too
flamboyant and overbearing, some will say, for the appetite of many of
us while Hajia Turai Yar’Adua controlled not just her husband but was
alleged to have held the nation to ransom during her husband’s illness
and eventual transition. And now, Patience Jonathan! In essence, no
Nigerian First Lady has passed through that duty without one infraction
or the other being held against her at least during the pendency of the
office.
Although we make the perceived excesses
of First Ladies appear exclusively Nigerian, this is not necessarily so.
For decades, wives of American presidents have displayed a variety of
these traits that upset us.
For instance, it is said that former
President Bill Clinton would possibly have never made it to office but
for his wife, Hillary, who had predicted 20 years earlier that her
husband would one day rule America and then helped work his way up to
it.
When her husband eventually became
president, Mrs Clinton directed state policy and was put on the head of
the Task Force on National Health Care reform even as she espoused a
number of key legislation. She was the first president’s wife who
operated from the West Wing instead of the customary East Wing. She also
went on to contribute substantially to some foreign policy thrusts of
the US including the appointment of Madeleine Albright as the first
female Secretary of State.
But American first ladies started the
gradual process of holding their own years before Hillary Clinton. Sarah
Polk who was First Lady from 1845 to 1849 was said to have assisted her
husband with his speeches, gave him advice on policy matters and played
an active role in his campaign even as she reached across party lines.
Edith Wilson who is cheekily referred to by some people as America’s
first female president was reputed to have taken control of states’
affairs, deciding what came to the notice of her husband and what did
not when Woodrow Wilson suffered a stroke in 1919.
Eleanor Roosevelt was the first spouse
of a president to hold press conferences, write a syndicated newspaper
column, and speak at a national convention.
On her part, Rosalyn Carter sat on the
cabinet and policy meetings and was one of her husband, Jimmy Carter’s
closest advisers. She was even named as an envoy at some point!
Laura Bush was noted to have broached
controversial issues like gay marriage, stem cell research and abortion.
She was also in the forefront of the fight for the enforcement of the
rights of women in Afghanistan among others.
From the American experience therefore,
it is obvious that the sphere of influence of each First Lady is related
to the value that the husband places on her. And that brings me to the
question of what value President Jonathan places on his wife.
Unlike current American First Lady,
Michelle Obama, who is a fashion icon in addition to her work on healthy
eating and kid exercising, Patience in spite of her expensive wardrobe
has not made any remark fashion statement neither has she made much out
of her peace for Africa initiative.
And as preparations for the next
elections heat up, it is obvious that President Jonathan desires to put
his wife’s political mobliisation skills to use. And I do not see
anything conventionally wrong with this as it is allowed even in the
best of democratic traditions. Some political historians in the United
States indeed agree that “a spouse can make an impassioned and defensive
attack on a political rival or the media with less controversy because
it is seen as the emotional prerogative of a spouse to do so” Something
that the Jonathans or their handlers may have studied.
However, a First Lady who wants the
respect and seeks the survival of a country must gauge her speech and
work towards protecting the values of that society. Lately, Nigeria’s
First Lady has thrown caution to the winds on more than one occasion.
She has uttered statements that have at different times seemed to
suggest violence, denigrated other parts of the country and directly
insulted the person of her husband’s main rival in the forthcoming
election.
It is alright for Mrs. Jonathan to work
for the return of her husband to office, there is however the need for
more tact and decorum in her outings. No matter how tough the campaigns
get, there are things that must not be heard from either the President
or his wife as they will send negative signals to supporters on either
side. It is time for the man and lady of the moment to apply some
caution for their own sake and the sake of the nation.
- This Piece was written by Niran Adedokun/Punch. Follow this writer on Twitter: @niranadedokun
No comments:
Post a Comment